in reply to Re^2: A better implementation of LCSS?
in thread A better implementation of LCSS?

I agree. For this module, it not relevant that it's written in Perl.

Longest common subsequence is also abbreviated LCS, and String::LCS is not currently used.

Update: And of course, that's not the problem you are solving. It does go to show that LCSS is a bad choice anyway.

Algorithm::LCSS::LCSSLonguest common subsequence
String::LCSS::lcssLonguest common substring
Algorithm::Diff::LCSLonguest common subsequence

String::LCSubstr?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: A better implementation of LCSS?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 28, 2010 at 06:52 UTC
    String::LCSubstr?

    I'm coming to the conclusion, that is the least-worst option. Now all I got do is remember my PAUSE credentials and how to package it up.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom