in reply to Re^7: More intelligent warning?
in thread More intelligent warning?

Okay. I should have checked which post you were responding to. I thought you were saying that you used split to deliberately, implicitly split to @_;

I also use shift/pop implicitly on @ARGV, especially in one liners. But in scripts I have tried to force myself to explicitly state @ARGV. I still use implicit shifts and pops within subs.

But LanX was only suggesting some features be disable if you used no oddities; or similar, so it wouldn't stop anyone doing so, unless they chose not to. Kinda of a cut down, runtime actioned perl::critic, but without the dogmas...


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"I'd rather go naked than blow up my ass"