Re: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?

I don't use Test::*, so give my opinion on this just as much weight as it deserves.

But would you fit a sound system in your car, that forced you to wear your seatbelt when you listen to it?

Comment on Re: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings? by Ovid (Cardinal) on Feb 07, 2010 at 08:57 UTC
I believe you've mentioned before that you don't use `Test::` modules, but I can't find that response and I can't remember what you say you do to verify your code works correctly. Could you refresh my memory? I'm curious to know what other strategies people apply. Cheers, Ovid The official Perl 6 wiki.	[reply]
Re^2: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings? by chromatic (Archbishop) on Feb 06, 2010 at 23:03 UTC
I don't use `Test::`....* That explains your analogy. Let me fix it for you: Would you have a new braking system installed in your car if they also upgraded your airbags?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Feb 06, 2010 at 23:09 UTC
Not unless there was something wrong with the old one.	[reply]
Re^3: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings? by Gavin (Archbishop) on Feb 07, 2010 at 11:28 UTC
"Would you have a new braking system installed in your car if they also upgraded your airbags?" Would not that analogy imply that there could be something possibly wrong with the new braking system that may require better airbags.	[reply]