in reply to Re^3: Avoiding INIT
in thread Avoiding INIT
The idea is to eliminate a potential source of confusion. I know that when I was developing tests I was constantly asking myself, "WTF is this?" before remembering that I was looking at the INIT block -- which I had written of course :-(.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: Avoiding INIT
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 09, 2010 at 21:02 UTC | |
by geoffleach (Scribe) on Feb 13, 2010 at 19:04 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 14, 2010 at 01:17 UTC | |
by geoffleach (Scribe) on Feb 16, 2010 at 18:29 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 16, 2010 at 18:45 UTC |