in reply to Re^6: How to simulate a preprocessor macro without one?
in thread How to simulate a preprocessor macro without one?
sorry I have no real idea what you want...
Cheers Rolf
UPDATE: I'm speculating you don't want to "overload qq" but simulate operators working on variable names.
So please explain, what's the problem with PadWalker (as already suggested) for lexical vars and (if necessary) inspecting the stash (symbol table hash) for package vars???
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Partially Solved: How to simulate a preprocessor macro without one?
by AriSoft (Sexton) on Feb 13, 2010 at 15:04 UTC |