If you're bad enough at communicating that you have to resort to personal attacks to punctuate your points...

Pot... kettle... sigh... There's a certain type of developer who tries to tame complexity by writing lots of tiny classes with one-line methods, and IME they're usually clueless.

If my code did that, I wouldn't use it either. Fortunately, it doesn't.

LOLWHUT? Oh... I see we're having a pedantry slap-fight here. No, your code doesn't import modules based on a quantum source of true randomness. But it does "helpfully" import pragmas that you like, but your users may not. IMHO strict is sometimes useful, and warnings is usually more trouble than it's worth, but apparently MHO doesn't count here. In any case, I think "Dogmatic::Perl" is silly, but at least it does one thing -- enforce chromatic's preferences on your code -- and does it well. Having other modules (e.g. Moose, Test::Most) import various pragmas is ridiculous.

Histrionics have no place in serious discussions of programming.

Hm... This isn't "discussion of programming"; it's "programming politics," and like all politics, it ain't beanbag.