Re (tilly) 2: Limit AM's Posting Rights

My opinion on the matter has been consistent all along.

If AM or equivalent did not exist, I would never have joined. There are quite a few others here who joined after posting as AM, and I suspect that many of them would likewise not be here were it not for the availability of AM. Furthermore if AM was removed, I would see that as an active statement that this site is not intended to be helpful to all comers. In that case, I don't see why I should remain...

Is that a good enough reason to keep AM in your eyes?

Comment on Re (tilly) 2: Limit AM's Posting Rights

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re (tilly) 2: Limit AM's Posting Rights by scottstef (Curate) on May 22, 2001 at 19:56 UTC
Tilly, not to bait you, as you know I highly respect your opinion and abilities, I do disagree with your point. With the exception of the monks here that have made contributions to the Perl Community at large and comment towards it on their home nodes/posts or the people that link to home pages at large, how much do we really know about each other? Other than stuff that is posted on this site, I don't know much about the people here, and they do not know much about me. How is having a login going to change what people learn about AM, if you post a profile here, people can learn about you from it. If you don't post your info, people can't learn about you. Not trying to start a flame war.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re (tilly) 2: Limit AM's Posting Rights
by scottstef (Curate) on May 22, 2001 at 19:56 UTC

Not trying to start a flame war.

[reply]