Re: Regex Nested Matching

First things first: What do you hope to achieve by fitting it all into a single regular expression? The usual results of that are things like puzzling the humans (including yourself months from now) who ultimately have to decipher your code, and causing the regex engine to wander back and forth through your string a lot (which it's happy to do, but not necessarily very efficient at.) If it's logical from the standpoint of reading and maintaining the code to use 2 regexes, use 2 regexes.

Also, if your data is in a standard markup language, you may well be happier using a library to parse it, rather than hand-rolling a regex to do it.

Comment on Re: Regex Nested Matching

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Regex Nested Matching by Rodster001 (Pilgrim) on Feb 24, 2010 at 22:33 UTC
Well, this code won't be around for long. I have three complex static html and javascript files I need to parse, stick in the DB and then be done with them (forever). But, I am looking into HTML parsers on CPAN to make this task a little easier. Thanks!	[reply]
Re^3: Regex Nested Matching by SuicideJunkie (Vicar) on Feb 25, 2010 at 14:41 UTC
If it is a single-use script, then that is all the more reason to keep it simple. Why try to get creative and write an Obfu regex when you just need to get the job done and then throw it away? Lay it out, don't worry about compactness and just make sure that the code will obviously do what you want it to. (Throwing pre-written HTML parsing modules at it is even better) After all, you're going to spend far more time thinking about edge cases and correctness than you will spend typing the code!	[reply]