in reply to Re: andy pondering Re: Re: Re: Re: JAPH-ing Genetically
in thread JAPH-ing Genetically

I meant 'the probability of a syntax error'. Andy.
  • Comment on Re: Re: andy pondering Re: Re: Re: Re: JAPH-ing Genetically

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: andy pondering Re: Re: Re: Re: JAPH-ing Genetically
by Anonymous Monk on May 23, 2001 at 19:03 UTC
    Not so large. The DWIM in perl deciphers a good part of junk to things no one has dreamed of. There are many warnings. A variable can have a junk name. The possibilities are endless. You could split your string and use the half(third...)that doesn't contain the error. Or how many parts contain an error if the string is cut haphazardly(=1/FITNESS).