in reply to Re^3: What I am paid for
in thread What I am paid for

IIRC, this also applies to photographers. It becomes a real pain when trying to put together a collection of old family photographs for a family album. If the photo has any semblance to a studio photo or a work for hire, you are supposed to track down the date of creation, original studio, and try to get permission from that studio (or heirs) for copying. My wife did this a few years back, and the magic year was 1923 (or thereabouts).

I have even heard stories of Old Mrs. Jones bringing in a war photo of her Jonny, asking to have a copy of it made, and actually having it be a sting operation of sorts (this was told me by a Kinkos employee, scale the accuracy attribute as you will).

It is said that "only perl can parse Perl." I don't even come close until my 3rd cup of coffee. --MidLifeXis

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What I am paid for
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 08, 2010 at 20:18 UTC

    Yeah. The current situation regarding the whole of IP is 'patently' ridiculous. And I fear it will get (much) worse before it gets better.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.