Re^2: Forking children operate sequentially?!

Thanks ikegami.

Is it possible to *not* wait for the child to return output, yet still capture it?

Yeah, those names suck. I copied it from some other code, I think it originated from the cookbook.

Comment on Re^2: Forking children operate sequentially?!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Forking children operate sequentially?! by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 11, 2010 at 20:23 UTC
Is it possible to not* wait for the child to return output, yet still capture it?* Well, what you want to do is move the waiting to the outside of the loop, and wait for all the children "at once" (via polling, `select`, or whatever). Below is a solution using Thread::Queue.	[reply] [d/l]