in reply to Constant communication between processes

Does this describe the situation?

_____ _____________ _______________ __________ |PHP|----|Perl script|--------->| Perl "Clent"| | | ----- ------------- | | | | _____ _____________ | | | | |PHP|----|Perl script|--------->| | | | ----- ------------- | |------->|Remote | _____ _____________ | | |server | |PHP|----|Perl script|--------->| | | | ----- ------------- | | | | _____ _____________ | | | | |PHP|----|Perl script|--------->| | | | ----- ------------- --------------- ----------

Four (to 10) PHP servers, call a perl script (50X/sec) to send something to a Perl "client" that then forwards those messages to a remote server.

The perl "client" receives boolean responses from the remote server. Does it return those responses to the PHP servers?

The Perl "client" is there to prevent the perl script from having to reestablish a connection to the remote server every time. But having the perl script talk to the perl "Client" via socket would just move the problem back a stage, so your hoping that they can communicate via shared memory. The perl script is involved because you don't know if you can do socket communications directly from PHP.

I find it unlikely that starting a new process and establishing a connection to the shared memory will be any faster than (say) connection to a server socket within the perl "client".


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"I'd rather go naked than blow up my ass"