wrinkles has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
What is my code doing that warrants a warning, and how do I fix it? Thanks. Abridged warnings:
Use of uninitialized value in length at ./jumble.pl line 34, <DATA> li +ne 1. Use of uninitialized value in split at ./jumble.pl line 34, <DATA> lin +e 1. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./jumble. +pl line 36, <DATA> line 1. Use of uninitialized value in split at ./jumble.pl line 33, <DATA> lin +e 1.
The offending code
use strict; use warnings; use List::Util 'shuffle'; while (<DATA>) { my @newline = split(/\b/); for my $word (@newline) { my $first = ""; my $rem = ""; my $middle = ""; my $last = ""; ($first, $rem) = split /(?<=\b\w)/, $word; ($middle, $last) = split /(?=(\w'\w+|\w)$)/, $rem; ((length $middle) == 2) ? $middle = reverse $middle : ($middle = join "", shuffle(split //, $middle)); print "$first$middle$last"; } }
__END__ I couldn't believe that I was actually understanding what I was readin +g. The phenomenal power of the human mind, according to research at Cambr +idge University, suggests that it doesn't matter in what order the letters in a word ar +e, as long as the first and last letters are in the right place. The rest can be a t +otal mess, and you can still read it without a problem. This is because the human + mind does not read every letter by itself, but the word as a whole. Amazing, huh +? Yeah, and I always thought spelling was important! Check apostrope and punctuation: Jame's, They're, we'll they'd.
And here's the output, with warnings off: I cdolun't beievle taht I was aalulcty uedsnadnnitrg waht I was rdaenig. The peeaonhmnl peowr of the hmuan mnid, adcircnog to rerecash at Cibmdarge Uteirsvniy, ssugetgs taht it dosen't mettar in waht odrer the lterets in a wrod are, as lnog as the fisrt and lsat ltteres are in the rghit pcale. The rset can be a toatl mses, and you can siltl raed it woihtut a pboerlm. Tihs is bceusae the hmuan mnid deos not raed eervy lteetr by iseltf, but the wrod as a wlhoe. Ainzamg, huh? Yaeh, and I ayawls tguhhot splileng was intpaormt! Cchek asoptorpe and puttiunoacn: Jmae's, Tehy're, we'll tehy'd.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: unititialized value warning
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 14, 2010 at 01:45 UTC | |
by wrinkles (Pilgrim) on Mar 14, 2010 at 02:33 UTC |