Re^6: signature background color or outline

Without verifying, I suspect there are many tags added to PM posts that are not addressed by the default CSS. But I think there is another issue in play:

How much do we want to incentivize Anonymous Monk (vs. registered users)?

Personally, I think it is worthwhile to gently discourage Anonymous Monk, or, rather, encourage him to register.

HTH,

planetscape

Comment on Re^6: signature background color or outline

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: signature background color or outline by moritz (Cardinal) on Apr 01, 2010 at 10:35 UTC
It's not only about encouraging to register (or not), but also how we present ourselves to the outside world. And I think a good design (which lets you distinguish posting and signature) would speak for us, not against us. Perl 6 - links to (nearly) everything that is Perl 6.	[reply]
Re^7: signature background color or outline by Jenda (Abbot) on Apr 01, 2010 at 12:12 UTC
It would take more than the inability to distinguish the post from the signature to force me to have anything to do with CSS. Make the default green and purple and I might, otherwise I will not bother. And with me quite a few others. Jenda Enoch was right! Enjoy the last years of Rome.	[reply]
Re^8: signature background color or outline by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Apr 02, 2010 at 08:29 UTC
Hey, my wedding colors were green (forest) and purple (eggplant). Besides, all us old-timers know a signature starts with "\n\n--\n" anyway. ;-)	[reply]
Re^7: signature background color or outline by Anonymous Monk on Apr 01, 2010 at 22:06 UTC
So to have readable nodes , you not only have to sign up, but you have to learn about CSS also? Brilliant!	[reply]
Re^8: signature background color or outline by planetscape (Chancellor) on Apr 02, 2010 at 03:55 UTC
Nah, even that is not enough to guarantee readable nodes - just look at Nodes To Consider. ;-) HTH, planetscape	[reply]