Re^3: [Golfing] Uncommenting a block

Well it wasn't an editor question ...

Which can still be answered by "use the appropriate tool for the job", which in this case happens to be an editor.

Abusing language features is an ugly hack, and going to hurt you in the long run. One drawback of using a heredoc is that you don't see if you're inside a comment without knowing the context.

Not seeing the context happens quite often, for example when reviewing diffs/patches.

Perl 6 - links to (nearly) everything that is Perl 6.

Comment on Re^3: [Golfing] Uncommenting a block

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: [Golfing] Uncommenting a block by LanX (Saint) on Apr 14, 2010 at 13:13 UTC
>Which can still be answered by "use the appropriate tool for the job", which in this case happens to be an editor. LOL, I don't have the impression that you really read my posts... I already use the right tool, and apparently you have little knowledge of emacs or org-modeš. Furthermore this thread is already flagged as "`[Golfing]`". Amen Rolf (š) which is no code which needs extra marks when using diff! UPDATE: killed last line.	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: [Golfing] Uncommenting a block
by LanX (Saint) on Apr 14, 2010 at 13:13 UTC

>Which can still be answered by "use the appropriate tool for the job", which in this case happens to be an editor.

LOL, I don't have the impression that you really read my posts...

I already use the right tool, and apparently you have little knowledge of emacs or org-modeš.

Furthermore this thread is already flagged as "[Golfing]".

Amen Rolf

(š) which is no code which needs extra marks when using diff!

UPDATE: killed last line.

[reply]
[d/l]