My first reply was a detailed repetition of the OP....

No, you omitted the part I specifically asked about.

Honestly you have the tendance to answer without really reading the question

Says the person who still hasn't answered my question. (x3)

But I have the strong impression you just want to repeat your usual "Perl can't be compiled to C" protocol.

I don't recall ever saying that*. In fact, the last time the subject came up, I said Perl is compiled to a list of C functions calls. Maybe you're thinking of someone else.

In any case, I definitely didn't say it here.

You usually demand to flag significant updates

You're thinking of someone else.

* — Not saying I didn't. It's obviously possible — Turing Completeness and such — but it's a question of costs and practicality, and that varies by case. Nothing "usual" about it.

Update: Added "*"