in reply to Re^2: [OT] LLP64 .v. LP64 portability
in thread [OT] LLP64 .v. LP64 portability

In some C files that I've written, I've suppressed certain warnings with:
#ifdef _MSC_VER #pragma warning(disable:4700 4715 4716) #endif
I forget which 3 warnings they equate to - and haven't checked. If it's just a matter of shutting 'em up, without being too particular about the means employed, I think there's a chance that approach could be useful.

With any luck you'd only need to do it in a few select header files (assuming that many of those 73 source files #include a common header).

Cheers,
Rob

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: [OT] LLP64 .v. LP64 portability
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 UTC

    Shutting up the warnings would be useful (for Perl) if I was convinced they were all false alarms, but I'm semi-convinced that one or more of them is the reason behind some traps I experience when I get close to allocating 4GB of virtual memory.

    For Parrot, which effectively equates sizeof( INTVAL ) == sizeof( void* ) all over the show, I'm convinced that the configuration utility (that actually warns of the problem), is doing the wrong thing with respect to how it defines the fundemental typedefs.

    Personally, I think that on windows the following typedefs for STRLEN, IV and UV should be used. And most (if not all) uses of int, I32, and U32 should dropped in favour of one if the 3 above.

    #include <stdio.h> #include <stddef.h> typedef uintptr_t UV; typedef ptrdiff_t STRLEN; typedef intptr_t IV; #ifdef _WIN64 #define IS_WIN64 "" #else #define IS_WIN64 "not" #endif void main( void ){ printf( "_WIN64 is %s defined\n", IS_WIN64 ); printf( "MAX: %d\n", _INTEGRAL_MAX_BITS ); printf( "size_t is %d bytes\n", sizeof( size_t ) ); printf( "int is %d bytes\n", sizeof( int ) ); printf( "long is %d bytes\n", sizeof( long ) ); printf( "long long is %d bytes\n", sizeof( long long ) ); printf( "UV is %d bytes\n", sizeof( UV ) ); printf( "IV is %d bytes\n", sizeof( IV ) ); printf( "STRLEN is %d bytes\n", sizeof( STRLEN ) ); }

    Compiled for 32 & 64-bit targets this produces:

    C:\test>size_t.exe _WIN64 is not defined MAX: 64 size_t is 4 bytes int is 4 bytes long is 4 bytes long long is 8 bytes UV is 4 bytes IV is 4 bytes STRLEN is 4 bytes C:\test>size_t.exe _WIN64 is defined MAX: 64 size_t is 8 bytes int is 4 bytes long is 4 bytes long long is 8 bytes UV is 8 bytes IV is 8 bytes STRLEN is 8 bytes

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
      I'm not familiar with those types. On paper, uintptr_t and intptr_t look good for UV and IV. However, STRLEN should remain whatever strlen returns. That is usually size_t, and it's accessed via Size_t.
        I'm not familiar with those types.

        They are standard types for microsoft compilers: MS CRT Standard types.

        STRLEN should remain whatever strlen returns. That is usually size_t, and it's accessed via Size_t.

        The problem is, as you pointed out above, size_t, (actually defined as what sizeof() returns), is an unsigned type, and therefore cannot handle negative indexing.

        And since (on 32-bit), it isn't possible to have strings longer than 2GB, to me it makes sense to avoid the need for casting between signed and unsigned, and all the noise that adds to the sources, by utilising the otherwise unused high-bit to accommodate both Perl's negative indexing, and general pointer math.

        ptrdiff_t (long integer or __int64, depending on the target platform) Result of subtraction of two pointers.

        Seems to be perfectly defined for this purpose.

        POSIX (though not ANSI or ISO) also define an equivalent type ssize_t for similar reasons.


        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.