Xiong has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

If you saw this in software, what would you call it?

++ for short, unique, easy-to-type nouns.

Updates:

Points:

Finished:

The winner, thrown in sideways via pointer from CB, is 'hump'. My ++ to all comments and Thank You!

- the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne -

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Yet another identifier crisis
by ww (Archbishop) on Apr 21, 2010 at 22:07 UTC

    "tt" for "training toy"
        ooops, tt is taken for a higher purpose...
    so how about
    "PHP" for "Pound Hammer Play?"
        (No higher application found.)

Re: Yet another identifier crisis
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 21, 2010 at 23:24 UTC

    Kinda depends upon the point you're trying to make.

    1. Positive:
      • Round pegs (for round holes).
      • Fit for purpose.
      • Does one thing well.
    2. Negative:
      • Pointless.
      • Dead-end.
      • Oversimplified.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re: Yet another identifier crisis
by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 21, 2010 at 22:26 UTC
    My son has a similar toy, it is called "Bang Bang Fun" on the box.
Re: Yet another identifier crisis
by cdarke (Prior) on Apr 22, 2010 at 07:47 UTC
    I would call it a JPEG graphics file.
Re: Yet another identifier crisis
by wfsp (Abbot) on Apr 22, 2010 at 10:12 UTC
    Swiss army chainsaws sound dangerous. Having enough rope can also be risky. Giving a tired grizzley two year old a mallet? I'd call it reckless.

    Anyways, everybody knows you buy your friends' kids drumkits and trumpets.