in reply to What is the scope of Perl Monks?

IMHO, it would be ok to post such questions here. In case it should get out of hands one day (volume-wise), we can still start thinking about creating new sections...  Also, people can always prefix their subject line with something like [Rakudo] to avoid confusion.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: What is the scope of Perl Monks?
by ww (Archbishop) on Apr 27, 2010 at 18:02 UTC
    Given that many questions appear to be from folks still stuck on 5.8 (or 5.10), one might expand on almut's thought about labeling: label not just language, but also version, e.g., HoH error messages [ Rakudo 0.21 ] or Unexpected match (non-greedy) [ 5.8.8 ] perhaps?

    Rationale: the answers which offer a (pick a vers) solution only to receive a counter-answer to the general effect of 'but I can't do that; I'm running (some other vers).

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
      Rakudo 0.21 ] or Unexpected match (non-greedy) [ 5.8.8 ] perhaps?

      [download]
      That could work well. I can just picture it....

      URgenT hElp pLZ!!! [5.8.8]

      *grin*

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
        Shouldn't that be:
        "UR6en7 h3lp pLZ!!! 5.ate.ate"?
        :-)
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion