Careening off into mere supposition:

1. The TOS were probably written by a lawyer.
2. You don't write like a lawyer; therefore you are probably not a lawyer
3. Therefore, the TOS probably mean something neither your nor I would recognize without instruction by a lawyer
4. Therefore, the apparent absence of any direct reference to consequences of evading the restriction is probably meaningless.

Or, summarizing and condensing, when you get the notion to do something "clever" to evade a restriction that may have legal foundation or support, don't.

    :-)