in reply to Re^2: Unsatisfactory state of Module::Starter stack
in thread Unsatisfactory state of Module::Starter stack
I had a very brief look at Dist::Zilla. It fails to sell itself to me (perhaps they need to hire a copywriter).That's one of my irks about Ricardo Signes. Most of his modules are DEEPLY underdocumented and it's not always clear what practical use they have. But I'm speaking as the general public. Ricardo rolls deep on irc.perl.org in #moose with all the heavy hitters. They work around the clock as a dedicated pack of hackers in a cooperative non-elitist fashion.
When he puts out a module its because that pack of hackers COLLECTIVELY see it as a best of breed choice having surveyed everything out there.
In particular it clearly attempts to be a much more comprehensive system than Module::Starter. If they succeed this is of course a virtue, but I am just left with an aching feeling that is bound to incompatible with me somewhere.Yes, I agree. I still use Module::Starter myself. But if you join the IRC channels and chat them up, they will be glad to discuss their aims and bring you in to submit patches, etc. And also why they started a new project instead of extending Andy's.
-- Terence Parr, "Enforcing Strict Model View Separation in Template Engines"
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Unsatisfactory state of Module::Starter stack
by petdance (Parson) on May 24, 2010 at 14:09 UTC | |
by metaperl (Curate) on May 24, 2010 at 17:57 UTC | |
|
Re^4: Unsatisfactory state of Module::Starter stack
by SilasTheMonk (Chaplain) on May 25, 2010 at 15:00 UTC | |
by metaperl (Curate) on May 25, 2010 at 18:24 UTC |