in reply to Re: validating unicode chars in their smallest form
in thread validating unicode chars in their smallest form

It looks like the original question has been edited away. Please don't do that. It prevents others from learning from what your post originally contained and from the answers to it. Paul

Oh no! not my intent I reply from small screen device and didn't realize, sorry. I have updated the message.

I think I've decided to replace and ascii compatible unicode with the larger latin equivalents I mention. I'm not really sure what's correct, it seems like going to smaller is correct. However I get data from users in both formats depending on the personal habits/how their pc is setup, so.

thanks
  • Comment on Re^2: validating unicode chars in their smallest form