Re^2: Random data generation.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Random data generation. by almut (Canon) on Jun 26, 2010 at 13:39 UTC
As there are only two of each character in the set which is shuffled (`(@chars) x 2`), there can of course also only occur two in a row at maximum. OTOH, this technique doesn't allow more than two of any character in the result (like `AACBAFFDCAEC`), so it might introduce an unwanted bias... (you didn't explicitly say whether this is desired or not, and it cannot be inferred from your valid samples).	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Random data generation. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 26, 2010 at 18:51 UTC
You're right. No, it isn't the one. It won't do at all.	[reply]
Re^5: Random data generation. by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 27, 2010 at 06:22 UTC
It sounds like you're still looking for a solution. Is there a problem with my solution? If so, let me know so I can fix it.	[reply]
Re^6: Random data generation. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 28, 2010 at 03:21 UTC
Re^3: Random data generation. by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 26, 2010 at 15:39 UTC
It's not random. Not even close. For example, you'll never have three of the same character anywhere in the string. I don't know if it matters, but it only works if `$len <= @set*2`	[reply] [d/l]