in reply to What's in a Reference?
it's meaningful to say, at some level of abstraction, that address 2 contains 42 indirectly.
No. Given
$bar = 42; $foo = \$bar;
one might say "foo is 42" in some contexts. But if you remove the abstraction and start talking of addresses, the statement becomes false. There isn't a 42 at address 2.
3 is the ________ of $2
You filled in too many words. "3 is referenced by $2" or "$2 references 3".
Address (of $3)
Update: Misread.
|
|---|