in reply to What's in a Reference?

it's meaningful to say, at some level of abstraction, that address 2 contains 42 indirectly.

No. Given

$bar = 42; $foo = \$bar;

one might say "foo is 42" in some contexts. But if you remove the abstraction and start talking of addresses, the statement becomes false. There isn't a 42 at address 2.

3 is the ________ of $2

You filled in too many words. "3 is referenced by $2" or "$2 references 3".

Address (of $3)

Update: Misread.