in reply to What's in a Reference?

my $pest = 'flea'; $dog = \$pest; $cat = \$pest; $bob = \$dog; $sue = \$cat;

only what to call stuff when speaking English to you

You're ask for what I would say, but you provide sentence structures I wouldn't use. I would say:

  1. The pest is a flea
  2. The dog has fleas
  3. Bob's dog's pest
  4. Bob's dog has fleas
  5. The pest of the dog
  6. Fleas have infested the dog
  7. The dog is owned by Bob
  8. The pest of Bob's dog
  9. Fleas infest Bob's dog
  10. Fleas infest the dog
  11. The dog and the cat have fleas
  12. Bob's and Sue's pets have fleas

You, on the other hand, might say,

  1. $pest is 'flea'
    $pest contains 'flea'
    $pest holds 'flea'
    $pest's value is 'flea'
  2. [ $dog has no direct relationship to 'flea' ]
  3. [ $bob has no direct relationship to $pest ]
  4. [ $bob has no direct relationship to 'flea' ]
  5. $pest is the referenced by of $dog
  6. [ 'flea' has no direct relationship to $dog ]
  7. $dog is the referenced by of $bob
  8. [ $pest has no direct relationship to $bob ]
  9. [ 'flea' has no direct relationship to $bob ]
  10. [ 'flea' has no direct relationship to $dog ]
  11. $dog and $cat are equal
  12. $bob and $sue are both lexicals containing a reference

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: What's in a Reference?
by Xiong (Hermit) on Jul 16, 2010 at 18:09 UTC

    I understand that in several cases there is no direct relationship. I'm asking for words to describe the indirect relationships.

    In particular, I want words that fill the blanks without altering surrounding grammar. I understand that you might avoid the grammar I've chosen, in which case you may not want to supply a word to fill that blank.

    In (12), I'm looking for a word or short phrase describing the similarity of $bob and $sue. Since $$$bob and $$$sue both evaluate to 'flea', $bob and $sue are not unrelated and, in some sense, are "the same". However, they are not "the same" in the same way as $dog and $cat. I would like to be able to make the distinction explicit and precise.

    Thank you for your effort.

      I understand that in several cases there is no direct relationship. I'm asking for words to describe the indirect relationships

      And I provided as much.

      In particular, I want words that fill the blanks without altering surrounding grammar.

      You asked what you "should call stuff", and your fill in the blanks prevented that from being answered.

      In (12), I'm looking for a word or short phrase describing the similarity of $bob and $sue.

      Like I said, both their pets both have fleas.