in reply to Re^2: Are all .cgi helper modules unfit for http methods common in REST?
in thread Are all .cgi helper modules unfit for http methods common in REST?
You claim there is a bug, but you won't submit a bug report?
But does that mean there is no equivalent for the CGI interface?
No, it doesn't mean that, that would be jumping to conclusions.
...see this node ...No buffered reading....
Not very authoritative ... see Re^2: POST'ing a large File with LWP::UserAgent for one example, if LWP::UserAgent can use callbacks to chunk file uploads and downloads, so can you
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Are all .cgi helper modules unfit for http methods common in REST?
by isync (Hermit) on Aug 12, 2010 at 20:24 UTC |