Re^10: Convenient way to use 5.10 features in perldebugger?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Convenient way to use 5.10 features in perldebugger? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 16, 2010 at 15:50 UTC
It is a matter scope. `use features` is lexically scoped, and james2vegas demonstrated each statement has its own scope. Your statement is false, and your code does not support your statement.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^12: Convenient way to use 5.10 features in perldebugger? (demo) by tye (Sage) on Aug 16, 2010 at 17:17 UTC
It is a matter scope. `use features` is lexically scoped, and james2vegas demonstrated each statement has its own scope. Your statement is false, and your code does not support your statement. Since nobody has yet shown a case proving that any of these ever get run, nobody has yet demonstrated that the lack of affect is due to separate scoping instead of just being due to lack of execution. I see no examples yet that support your conclusion. LanX has given at least two examples that clearly demonstrate a lack of execution. - tye	[reply]
Re^13: Convenient way to use 5.10 features in perldebugger? (demo) by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 16, 2010 at 17:22 UTC
oh! I thought "`<`" was part of the prompt! Even if "`<`" did work properly, it wouldn't expect it to reliably handle a lexically scoped pragma. 100% with LanX.	[reply] [d/l] [select]