Re^4: emdash problems with XML::Simple

Makes sense. Except, if Parser is so much better than SAX why is Simple still using SAX as a default...

Comment on Re^4: emdash problems with XML::Simple

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: emdash problems with XML::Simple by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 28, 2010 at 03:47 UTC
I said faster, not better. One downside of XML::Parser is that XML::Simple doesn't support namespaces when it parses using it. I don't know if there's any other differences.	[reply]