Based on these definitions, I would generally agree.

As to the second point, it is worth mentioning that many language implementations today (and language designs today) are far more “dynamic” in nature than many earlier languages literally could afford to be.   Processor speeds and memory sizes are orders of magnitude larger than before, making many strategies practical which could not be considered in earlier times.   Languages quickly followed suit.   So, this distinction, in practical terms today, is just not that useful a distinction anymore.   It has become “academic.”

Q:   Where do you draw the line?
A:   Only where the line is useful.