in reply to Re^7: Pre vs Post Incrementing variables
in thread Pre vs Post Incrementing variables

No, I made no implied justification thus far.

The root of my reply was merely to reveal my experimentation with assigning the return of (++$i) to some value (since I also ran into the same error message you got).

Then, I attempted to explain the snippet you posted so that others may find it helpful to see what's going on.

My opinion? Yeah, the lvalue stuff is confusing and I don't quite see its usefulness. I would expect the behavior the OP expected.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Pre vs Post Incrementing variables
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 13, 2010 at 06:23 UTC
    I made no implied justification

    Then I apologise for misunderstanding your point.

    When I said: "Mind you, it might make explaining this one a tad awkward :)", I meant explaining the logic behind it, rather than the implementations behaviour.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.