in reply to Re^9: Pre vs Post Incrementing variables
in thread Pre vs Post Incrementing variables

Having already attempted to point out the significant difference between your "operand evaluation order

The only post between my first use of the term and your slander is Re^3: Pre vs Post Incrementing variables, but it indentifies no differences. Did you forget to post them? If I'm misusing the term, I'll be glad to correct myself.

  • Comment on Re^10: Pre vs Post Incrementing variables

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Pre vs Post Incrementing variables
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 13, 2010 at 16:10 UTC
    it indentifies no differences. Did you forget to post them?

    You somehow failed to notice the very first sentence of that very post? Including the emphasis I applied to the word 'operand'.

    And then again failed to notice the strikeout I applied to that same word when I re-quoted your phrase later in that same post?

    What more do I have to do to draw attention to the fact that you were discussing something that doesn't appear anywhere in the passage I quoted?

    What other conclusion can be drawn from your complete failure to accept the obvious?

    And (Damn it) You succeeded in drawing me into a meta-argument. So, I'm done.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

      You somehow failed to notice the very first sentence of that very post?

      It only points out that I used the name "operand". You said it also means something different. Nowhere have you pointed out any differences in meaning.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom