Re: clean output from Deobfucation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: clean output from Deobfucation by Anonymous Monk on Sep 21, 2010 at 07:38 UTC
`>That is not something which B::Deparse does. Apparently, that's the actual script's code you're looking at.` Yes , deparse is parsing a code that is initially obfuscated by Acme::EyeDrops `Now the script code that it prints I save that to a file "out" and then tried evaling that code-in-a-string by echo -e` [download] However I think I am missing your point . Thanks	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: clean output from Deobfucation by Corion (Patriarch) on Sep 21, 2010 at 08:08 UTC
Maybe you want to look at B::Deobfuscate and especially overload::eval, which gives some more avenues of output. By overloading eval, you can replace the `eval` that must happen somewhere in obfuscated/encoded code with a `print` command and look at the code to be evaluated.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: clean output from Deobfucation by Anonymous Monk on Sep 21, 2010 at 08:54 UTC
Thanks Corion . overload::eval is doing what echo -e is doing in my case. it resolves \t to tabs and \n to newlines etc but " @ $ % & are coming as \" \$ \@. I used Komodos' remote Debugging and that gives code from the eydrops obfuscated code. I think this was the request ! Thanks and cheers ! Kapil	[reply]