in reply to Re: Alternatives To Geo::Distance (hack)
in thread Alternatives To Geo::Distance
It seems to rapidly screw up as you move north.
The distance from (0,0)-(10,10) should be the same as from (80,0)-(90,10) as shown by the Geo::Distance output. Or should it?
[0,0][10,10] geo: 974.731395416589 972.5 .. 975.7 miles (3.27 range) 972.5 .. 975.7 miles (3.27 range) [10,0][20,10] geo: 974.731395416589 957.7 .. 960.9 miles (3.22 range) 957.7 .. 960.9 miles (3.22 range) [20,0][30,10] geo: 974.731395416589 929.4 .. 932.5 miles (3.13 range) 929.4 .. 932.5 miles (3.13 range) [30,0][40,10] geo: 974.731395416589 889.9 .. 892.9 miles (2.99 range) 889.9 .. 892.9 miles (2.99 range) [40,0][50,10] geo: 974.731395416589 842.7 .. 845.5 miles (2.84 range) 842.7 .. 845.5 miles (2.84 range) [50,0][60,10] geo: 974.731395416589 792.8 .. 795.5 miles (2.67 range) 792.8 .. 795.5 miles (2.67 range) [60,0][70,10] geo: 974.731395416589 746.2 .. 748.7 miles (2.51 range) 746.2 .. 748.7 miles (2.51 range) [70,0][80,10] geo: 974.731395416589 709.6 .. 712.0 miles (2.39 range) 709.6 .. 712.0 miles (2.39 range) [80,0][90,10] geo: 974.731395416589 689.4 .. 691.7 miles (2.32 range) 689.4 .. 691.7 miles (2.32 range)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Alternatives To Geo::Distance (hack)
by lidden (Curate) on Oct 22, 2010 at 11:01 UTC |