Re: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by lidden (Curate) on Oct 31, 2010 at 00:21 UTC
www.perlmonks.org has a different robots.txt from the other five. I guess that is a bug.	[reply]
Re^3: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 31, 2010 at 00:23 UTC
No, we don't want search engines indexing multiple version of the same page. It dilutes their usefulness and possibly the ranking of the pages.	[reply]
Re^4: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by szabgab (Priest) on Oct 31, 2010 at 04:33 UTC
For SEO purposes I think it would be better to have a single live site and the rest should redirect to the same address. As it is now, some people will link to http://www.perlmonks.org/ others to http://perlmonks.org/ and the other addresses. That will divide the inbound links and reduce the page rank of each page. That's true for all the nodes. -- Weekend SEO expert	[reply]
Re^5: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by ambrus (Abbot) on Oct 31, 2010 at 10:14 UTC
Re^5: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by Anonymous Monk on Oct 31, 2010 at 10:40 UTC
Re^6: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by JavaFan (Canon) on Oct 31, 2010 at 12:02 UTC
Re^3: www.perlmonks.org vs. perlmonks.org by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 31, 2010 at 00:29 UTC
I guess that is a bug. Going by the comment in perlmonks.org/robots.txt, it is not a bug, but rather deliberate. Perhaps, www.perlmonks.org, serves only periodic, static snapshots, rather than server intensive, dynamic content?	[reply]