in reply to Moose and AUTOLOAD

"handles" would not work too, because I know the eventual method names only at runtime and they may change.

Moose doesn't have anything to help you out with this, and honestly, changing method list at runtime is a serious design smell. You don't want the method list of RecordSet to be continually changing every time you make a new instance of a different table.

Also, why aren't you using one of the perfectly good ORMs out there? DBIx::Class? Fey::ORM? Rose::DB::Object?

-stvn

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moose and AUTOLOAD
by rootcho (Pilgrim) on Nov 04, 2010 at 15:05 UTC
    I like ORM, but they are not well suited for every task. I rather steal some of the ideas and make my own. ;)

    Which is lighter and more pure-SQL-query centric, with all the benefits and drawbacks of having more control.

    thanx