Re^3: XML::XPath Question

I was looking at <a href="http://search.cpan.org/~msergeant/XML-XPath-1.13/XPath.pm#findnodes%28$path,_$context%29">->findnodes, and there it says that.

But I remember hours of staring at various parts of the documentation, trying to piece together a whole, so there might be other parts that say something else.

Comment on Re^3: XML::XPath Question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: XML::XPath Question by TendulkarIsGod (Acolyte) on Nov 10, 2010 at 20:33 UTC
I don't get it.. a tree is still basically a node, and vice versa... what sets them apart?	[reply]
Re^5: XML::XPath Question by Corion (Patriarch) on Nov 10, 2010 at 20:40 UTC
No. A tree is an organization of nodes. And to search that tree, you have to employ the "XPath searcher" that lives in XML::XPath. You can't intermix methods from the searcher and the tree.	[reply]
Re^5: XML::XPath Question by ikegami (Patriarch) on Nov 10, 2010 at 21:38 UTC
No. Trees and XML::XPath objects are not nodes, and node objects are not XML::XPath objects. Trees have a node for root, and nodes belong to a tree. There are no is-a relationship between the two, just has-a relationships.	[reply]