in reply to Re^2: question on exitcode provided by status() method of Win32::Job
in thread question on exitcode provided by status() method of Win32::Job

So it wouldn't be surprising if the mysterious exit code value were the result of a bug.

Hm. That seems most unlikely. Why would the module place an internal error code in place of the exit code of the script it is calling?

  • Comment on Re^3: question on exitcode provided by status() method of Win32::Job

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: question on exitcode provided by status() method of Win32::Job
by stevehs17 (Novice) on Nov 18, 2010 at 01:38 UTC

    "Why would the module place an internal error code in place of the exit code of the script it is calling?"

    If the module has a bug in it, there's no telling what it will do, even if it's not what the author intended.