in reply to Re: RFC: A better name for an exception handling module?
in thread RFC: A better name for an exception handling module?

@jethro: I agree with you comment about *::Lite.

<rant>
However, please don't encourage more meaningless names. Meaningful names is one more plus in favour of CPAN, and lack of them is one of my pet peeves about python's library. Moose is a great set of modules and I use them, but I don't like the name; I am willing to concede that all the good names I can think of are already taken. There's a really nice networking framework in python called: Twisted. I think that's twisted and not helpful. I can find useful modules in CPAN by browsing categories.
</rant>

  • Comment on Re^2: RFC: A better name for an exception handling module?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: A better name for an exception handling module?
by Jenda (Abbot) on Dec 23, 2010 at 01:19 UTC

    I cannot agree more. "Cool" names are kinda OK for the big things like frameworks, but definitely not single purpose modules. Hpricot anyone? Yet another reason I hated Ruby.

    Jenda
    Enoch was right!
    Enjoy the last years of Rome.