in reply to 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required (THIS IS NOT OFF TOPIC!)
Does it matter what architecture? e.g. Itanium (ia64) vs PA-RISC (lp64) vs RISC (ppc5) vs Intel (x86_64)?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 24, 2010 at 14:57 UTC | |
Preferably all of them, but the latter would satisfy the majority of the target audience. Please note, there are no actually addresses involved. The problem lies in the types and constants required to make the math work correctly. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] |
by Tux (Canon) on Dec 24, 2010 at 15:05 UTC | |
On my x86_64 machine:
Yields
That was what you were looking for? Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 24, 2010 at 15:41 UTC | |
I don't think that is not going to work, p in main, and the arg to check_new() must be pointers. That's what makes this a problem. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] |
by Tux (Canon) on Dec 24, 2010 at 16:19 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 24, 2010 at 17:15 UTC | |
| |
by Tux (Canon) on Dec 24, 2010 at 15:14 UTC | |
Same program on Itanium2 with HP's ANSI C compiler:
Same program on PA-RISC2 with HP's ANSI C compiler:
Same program on PowerPC5 with IBM's XLC compiler:
Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn | [reply] [d/l] [select] |