Re^2: bit by overhead

Because without exception, every single answer in that thread pointed out that I didn't give enough detail for them to answer the question. :) Also, I've tried the most popular suggestion and found it doesn't work very well in this case.

Comment on Re^2: bit by overhead

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: bit by overhead by afoken (Chancellor) on Jan 06, 2011 at 17:13 UTC
Because without exception, every single answer in that thread pointed out that I didn't give enough detail for them to answer the question. And why didn't you post the missing details right there, where your problem was (and still is) already discussed? Also, I've tried the most popular suggestion and found it doesn't work very well in this case. Another little detail that belongs into the other thread. Alexander -- Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: bit by overhead
by afoken (Chancellor) on Jan 06, 2011 at 17:13 UTC

Because without exception, every single answer in that thread pointed out that I didn't give enough detail for them to answer the question.

And why didn't you post the missing details right there, where your problem was (and still is) already discussed?

Also, I've tried the most popular suggestion and found it doesn't work very well in this case.

Another little detail that belongs into the other thread.

Alexander

--
Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)

[reply]