Re: WWW::Mechanize::Firefox Random Errors with get() method

I got these errors with older versions of MozRepl::RemoteObject and WWW::Mechanize::Firefox when either too many events happened or when too many commands got sent. Upgrading both modules to their latest versions should help (and I think the problem is that WWW::Mechanize::Firefox currently has no prerequisite for MozRepl::RemoteObject v0.20).

I'm sorry for the negligence of not having bumped the MozRepl::RemoteObject prerequisite. Please tell me if upgrading it fixes things for you.

Comment on Re: WWW::Mechanize::Firefox Random Errors with get() method

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: WWW::Mechanize::Firefox Random Errors with get() method by andmott (Acolyte) on Jan 09, 2011 at 19:48 UTC
Hey no problem, the tool is great as it is and I'm very thankful that it is available on CPAN! I upgraded MozRepl::RemoteObject to 0.20, and MozRepl itself is version 0.06. It definitely fixed those errors, though I'm getting something new now: `Can't coerce array into hash at /Library/Perl/5.8.8/MozRepl/RemoteObject.pm line 729, <DATA> line 1.` This is still while running my example code. How new are MozRepl packages as well as the WWW::Mechanize::Firefox? Is this software under active development? I may be interested in getting involved. The whole thing is pretty cool, how you install a plugin in Firefox and use the Perl library to talk to it. Thanks for your help!	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: WWW::Mechanize::Firefox Random Errors with get() method by Corion (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2011 at 20:10 UTC
That error was a leftover debugging aid. I've disabled that in WWW::Mechanize::Firefox v0.43 (now on CPAN). The public repository for module development lives at http://github.com/corion for both, MozRepl::RemoteObject and WWW::Mechanize::Firefox.	[reply]
Re^4: WWW::Mechanize::Firefox Random Errors with get() method by andmott (Acolyte) on Jan 09, 2011 at 22:40 UTC
Awesome thanks so much! That cleared it right up, I'm up and running! The entire thing seems to run much better. Thanks!	[reply]