in reply to CGI Replacement Recommendations?

What kinds of tasks do you need to use? If you give us more information on what you're doing, we can recommend more specific information.

Catalyst is a good choice for writing web applications in Perl -- no one should look at you askance for doing so. It has a learning curve, but it's powerful and flexible and can handle complex applications.

CGI is an execution model, though. It's a standard for how a web server can launch and interact with a program to generate an HTTP response.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: CGI Replacement Recommendations?
by Sherm (Sexton) on Feb 09, 2011 at 04:06 UTC
    Catalyst is a *great* choice for writing web apps in Perl. It performs quite poorly under CGI though - compiling all of that module code for each request is a killer. It really needs to run under mod_perl or FastCGI.
Re^2: CGI Replacement Recommendations?
by OldDog (Initiate) on Feb 09, 2011 at 21:18 UTC