in reply to img function in GGI.pm

td(img({-src=>'/css/ico/notepencil32.png', -alt=>'ahoj', -height=>'23'
+, -width=>'23' -id=>'myid'}))
                                                                      
+              ^

[download]

You omitted the comma (so you're subtracting 'id' from 23...).

With warnings on, you'd have gotten "Argument "id" isn't numeric in subtraction (-) at ..."

Update: ...and this is for the downvoter, who was apparently too lazy to test himself: 

$ perl -wMCGI=:standard -le"print img({-src=>'/css/ico/notepencil32.pn
+g', -alt=>'ahoj', -height=>'23', -width=>'23', -id=>'myid'})"
<img height="23" src="/css/ico/notepencil32.png" id="myid" width="23" 
+alt="ahoj" />

[download]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: img function in CGI.pm
by kosta (Sexton) on Feb 09, 2011 at 19:39 UTC
    oh gosh oh gosh! It is always the little things that get me. Always! In some ways I love vim, I hate it in others (would have never happened with eclipse)
[reply]

      It would have been obvious with better layout in emacs with any perl mode too because the indentation breaks. I suspect vim has similar behavior. So just changing to shorter, more legible line widths will help on a couple of levels- 

      img({ -src=>'/css/ico/notepencil32.png',
      -alt=>'ahoj',
      -height=>'23',
      -width=>'23'
          -id=>'myid'})

      [download]
[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom