in reply to Re^2: BAIL_OUT with older Test::More
in thread BAIL_OUT with older Test::More
Well, I was thinking of this as well, but with the red tape and all I still don't know if I can introduce foreign code like this. It depends on whether the management will OK this or not, and whether the IT people feel paranoid that day...
In the meantime I'm doing without BAIL_OUT. In the eventuality that I can't use a more modern Test::More at all, what do you suggest?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: BAIL_OUT with older Test::More
by ELISHEVA (Prior) on Feb 15, 2011 at 17:20 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2011 at 19:08 UTC | |
by ELISHEVA (Prior) on Feb 15, 2011 at 19:50 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2011 at 20:10 UTC | |
|
Re^4: BAIL_OUT with older Test::More
by JavaFan (Canon) on Feb 15, 2011 at 17:01 UTC |