Re^4: redirect output from a command to another command

It has nothing to do with the shell. No shell is used by the Perl code I used. It's an OS feature.

And yes, it wouldn't be portable to other OSes (or differently setup OSes, based on your experience). I didn't mean to imply otherwise.

Comment on Re^4: redirect output from a command to another command

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: redirect output from a command to another command by DrHyde (Prior) on Mar 04, 2011 at 10:46 UTC
You were talking about my shell being broken. It is therefore OBVIOUS that I was talking about the shell code that started this thread and not your perl code, and it therefore has everything to do with the shell. If you bothered to pay attention you will also have noticed that I didn't even respond to your post that had perl code in it.	[reply]
Re^6: redirect output from a command to another command by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 04, 2011 at 18:35 UTC
If you bothered to pay attention you will also have noticed that I didn't even respond to your post that had perl code in it. One of the solution (named pipes) proposed is portable, the other was the Perl code. So to which solution were you referring if you weren't responding to the post that had the Perl code? You were talking about my shell being broken. Yes, until you said the solution wasn't portable. It (the solution) has nothing to do with the shell.	[reply]
Re^7: redirect output from a command to another command by DrHyde (Prior) on Mar 07, 2011 at 11:45 UTC
I suggest that you click the "in reply to" link on this post, and then on the page that takes you to, and so on. Then you will be enlightened.	[reply]
Re^8: redirect output from a command to another command by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 07, 2011 at 16:08 UTC
Re^9: redirect output from a command to another command by DrHyde (Prior) on Mar 08, 2011 at 11:29 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here