in reply to Re^4: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
in thread Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

You have chosen some particular ways to write Perl that you believe are "good", and campaign tirelessly to make them the unquestioned dogma. This campaign takes a number of forms, and I know I'm not the only one who thinks they are tiresome and/or harmful to Perl. But we've been over this before, and will have to agree to disagree.
  • Comment on Re^5: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Mar 07, 2011 at 04:36 UTC
    ... we've been over this before, and will have to agree to disagree.

    I don't agree with your libel:

    ... and campaign tirelessly to make them the unquestioned dogma.

    How can I make it easier for you to read the book in question and find out what it really says?

      How can I make it easier for you to understand "agree to disagree"?