Re^3: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Comment on Re^3: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing by punkish (Priest) on Mar 07, 2011 at 22:05 UTC
well, I would benchmark it against LAPACK, but I don't have the time, but if you want, you can do the benchmark and show me that I'm wrong :) So, you haven't really benchmarked it against LAPACK. Yet, you imply that PDL is slower than not just one (LAPACK) but many other similar tools. You want to be shown you are wrong. Why don't you make the effort and show that what you are asserting is indeed true. Fwiw, I do use Perl/PDL, and I don't use LAPACK, so it doesn't matter how fast LAPACK is. when small people start casting long shadows, it is time to go to bed	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.