Re^9: How we can separate a backref from a digit?

I don't agree that (4+5)*6 and (ln x) + y are confusing.

I didn't suggest either of those, nor anything remotely relating to them, was confusing. You've just plucked those out of thin air.

Once again, as is your normal practice when you've said something even you realise doesn't hold water, you attempt to distract from it by arguing something completely and utterly unrelated & irrelevant. Guess what, I'm not going to play.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^9: How we can separate a backref from a digit? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: How we can separate a backref from a digit? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 19, 2011 at 06:21 UTC
"On the basis that using grouping parens to group a single operator is more confusing than" is not followed by "nothing", so I didn't pluck that out of this air.	[reply]