in reply to Re: On uploading scripts to CPAN
in thread On uploading scripts to CPAN

Although there is no formal quality control, people do make use of the cpan ratings to voice their opinion.

My advice is to run your stuff by other people before uploading, if you're not sure. Choosing the wrong module name will get you grief from others. Some people don't read the pause docs and use non-descriptive top-level namespaces (e.g. Water !?) or create a namespace for their cpanid (e.g. DPCHRIST).

And instead of just reading docs to figure out the conventions, choose a few respected, and recently updated, modules to crib from.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: On uploading scripts to CPAN
by GrandFather (Saint) on Mar 19, 2011 at 23:35 UTC
    Although there is no formal quality control, people do make use of the cpan ratings to voice their opinion.

    From what I've seen most modules are unrated. Of those that are rated many have either been rated by the author or by members of the author's fan club, or by someone with a bee in their bonnet about some particular aspect of the module. I advise taking CPAN module ratings with a very large grain of salt!

    True laziness is hard work
Re^3: On uploading scripts to CPAN
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 19, 2011 at 17:59 UTC
    And if you want to share but don't care about quality or maintenance, you could always upload to github or bitbucket.