in reply to Re: SOAP::Lite - Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T
in thread SOAP::Lite - Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T

Why do you think the error message doesn't match the code? The code has an eval, which is the error message bemoans. I don't see any obvious mismatch.

  • Comment on Re^2: SOAP::Lite - Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: SOAP::Lite - Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 25, 2011 at 12:47 UTC
    • "Bad stub:" is not mentioned anywhere in OPs message
    • "Code execution error" doesn't appear in SOAP/Lite.pm
    • "returned error" doesn't appear in SOAP/Lite.pm
      "Bad stub:" is not mentioned anywhere in OPs message

      If the eval() dies due to taint modus (and not just returns undef because of normal failure), the or croak part will never executed. So not relevant.

      $ perl -Te 'eval shift or die "NO"' foo Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at -e line 1. $ no NO printed, see?
      • Code execution error" doesn't appear in SOAP/Lite.pm
      • "returned error" doesn't appear in SOAP/Lite.pm

      So it was wrapped in some other code that caught the error, and augmented with additional information. It looks to me that the line in question is still the source of the error, even if indirectly reported.

        Gah, I kept focusing on $_ being a hash key and thus not tainted

        Cheap fix

        sub generate_stub { ... $self->{'_stub'} = $1 if $self->{'_stub'} =~ /^(.*)/; return $self->stub; }